Showing posts with label Beach Boys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Beach Boys. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

2012 Grammys: Adele and a ceremony of Old vs. New.




This is my fourth year doing a Grammy recap but this is the first time I didn’t care about who won an award. I only wanted to see Adele’s reactions and the performances. The Grammys were pretty much going to be a coronation for Ms. Adkins and her gift of touching so many this past year. So this year’s Grammy was gonna be about the performances – as the awards show has typically been. Especially with fewer categories awarded in general and shown on TV.

The Good
- Bruno Mars is better being retro than he is being current.  He’s fun to watch and that performance channeled that era  - down to the moves, precision, voice, energy. Loved it.
- Paul McCartney showed how to be understated and tell a story with his ballad.
- Glen Campbell’s swan song. Do Not Go Gentle Into the Good Night, face your future boldly and kicking your heels. Much respect to him and his amazing farewell
- The Beach Boys!!! I wished Maroon 5 and Foster the People weren’t so out of place there because hearing Mike Love sing and Brian Wilson play and hearing those harmonies was beautiful! They still got it!  
- Bruce Springsteen doing what the Boss does best. Rocking out and showcasing the E. Street Band continuing on without the Big Man Clarence Clemons.
- Tony Bennett’s smoothness/Carrie Underwood being underrated. By the way, it amazes me how many folks Tony Bennett has outlived
- Bon Iver’s speech was a win for art. He spoke on how he was in it to make music, shouted out those  who didn’t make the stage and reminded people that an award isn’t the highest goal as much as it’s making great music.

The Bad


- Memo to Taylor Swift. Grow up. Writing the same songs about living a dream in such cutesy, but childish ways. Taking shots at people who think you can’t sing live. You’re an adult now. Time to step up and reflect that instead of selling a lie to these girls who buy your music.
- Chris Brown’s live music video. That was a nice light show with great dancing. Not much for singing

(Sidenote: CB’s career has revolved around the Grammys if you will. 5 years ago, he did the tribute for James Brown and performed with Lionel Richie and Smokey Robinson. 3 years ago, we all know what happened with Rihanna. Now, his “comeback” is complete.)

- Don Cornelius getting briefly mentioned with no soul tribute. In my mind, Don is as important as any musical figure in the last 40 years and he deserved not just his own mention but a reminder of how urban music changed the pulse of America.
- Rihanna and Katy Perry. No conviction. Just flash and sizzle. No wonder they sat next to each other. Partners in looking good with not much else to matter. For that matter, Rihanna and Coldplay too. I'm a  big Coldplay fan but Paradise might be one of my least favorite singles they've done.

The Grammys showed how popular Black music in a terrible state. When Chris Brown and Lil Wayne are “performing” with David Guetta over house and dubstep, it doesn’t bode well for the future. But I don’t think we’re in trouble because despite the Grammys not always highlighting the best of Black music recently, there’s always hope because we never needed popular validation for what’s dope.



Case in point, Diana Ross’ first Grammy was her Lifetime Achievement Award. To quote Phife Dawg, “I never let a statue tell me how nice I am.”

It also says how limited the future is if the older acts outshined the younger ones - at least the ones the Grammys highlighted. Part of that is their habitual problem not showing enough love to talented young acts. Foster the People, for example, should've had their own set to shine and we can already think of many younger acts who could've been nominated and performed briliantly.

That’s why Adele’s triumph was so great. I was hoping she’d do more than just stand there and sing but she performed and delivered well. She showed how to deliver a song with expression, sass and oomph! Well done after not having her voice for so long.

I felt genuine emotion in watching her win because it felt like talent was being rewarded. A coronation of a queen who gave us her pain, her voice and brought some earnestness back to music. An earnestness that we lost Saturday with Whitney Houston.

I’ll speak more on her in depth later but hearing her perform at the beginning was too chilling. I was angry that we were robbed of seeing that voice, that command, that brilliance. Then to hear Jennifer Hudson do it in her own way, I got chills. I started crying cause those words felt like Whitney talking to us from the grave.

Her demons took her apart and then took her away. An industry built on building up stars watched another flicker away. That’s what made Nicki Minaj’s performance so appalling, weird and disturbing.



There’s art and then there’s something showy that could be something sinister. From an artistic standpoint, Nicki put on an over-the-top show that showed how much she lacks as a musician but succeeds as an entertainer. Her fierce raps lacked bite cause you could barely hear them or focus on them.

But on a deeper level, I saw something worse in her exorcism, which I guess was failed? I saw an artist who was symbolically embracing the dark side shrouded in warped religious imagery.  Considering Whitney Houston succumbing to her demons was partially aided and abetted by an industry that didn’t help her, it was a terrible performance and made me fearful for Nicki messing around with that.

Other artists have done that before. Yet given my state of my mind and the folks around me tweeting around her, it was disturbing to my soul in a way I haven’t felt for something. The first female rapper to perform solo at the Grammys and that’s what we saw? I guess.

But ultimately the 2011 Grammys will be remembered for saying goodbye to a legend and celebrating a new talent realizing her greatness. Congrats to Adele.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Greatest LA Band of my lifetime?



My post from Monday had a line that made a few folks wonder - I said that the Red Hot Chili Peppers were the best band Los Angeles has produced in my lifetime (since 1984). Outside of Guns N Roses, it's hard to argue against what the Chili Peppers have done to earn that.

Since their breakthrough album Mother's Milk in 1988, they've had a slew of hits and great albums while evolving from a punk/funk band to a rock band with solid melodies, brilliant songwriting and the ability to still keep it funky and raw. When their next album drops (soon I hope), it'll be one of the biggest rock albums of the year.

They're still relevant, their impact is rock solid and their legacy is still being written as one of the greatest bands of the last 30 years. Not to mention they're #1 on my must-see in concert list. But what about others who could make that argument for being LA's finest? For me, it all starts with Axl, Slash, and the boys.



Guns N' Roses had a six year run that rivals any band in music history. A sonic boom that paved the way for Metallica and Nirvana to kill the hair metal of the 80's and a rawness that captured the essence of the Sunset Strip back then.

Classic songs, a genre defining album, the powerful combo of Axl's voice, Slash's guitar and combustible creativity. Makes me wish Axl didn't blowtorch that legacy with his ego because had G'N'R lasted even 5-6 more years in that form, they wouldn't just be one of the greatest bands ever. They could arguably be the greatest band of the post-Led Zeppelin era.

Not a bad consolation to be cited as one of the greatest based on a perfect storm. But as we waited for Axl to drop Chinese Democracy, Slash and Co. made great music with Velvet Revolver and RHCP kept doing their thing. Greatness not denied, but never totally realized.



Fishbone came out around the same time as RHCP (even toured with them in 1988) and is the most underrated/underappreciated band of my lifetime. I didn't get into them until 2004-05 but once I did, it was easy to see why they don't get much love.

Their best albums ("Truth and Soul" and "Reality of My Surroundings") got them some moderate success but despite their ska/funk/punk/hard rock sound, the mainstream never fully came around to them. Those who saw them perform said they were the greatest live act they had seen. Even the ska revolution of the mid-90's didn't produce anymore fame.

By 1993, they lost guitarist Kendall Jones at their peak. Other members left and they continued to be a cult phenomenon. One day I hope to see them live and witness their genius. While they didn't get the full mainstream love (and were a victim of label politics), Fishbone had probably more influence on more bands in So.Cal than anybody. Just ask No Doubt or the Chili Peppers themselves.

(Edit: Somehow I forgot to mention this next band in my original post although they have my favorite guitarist and helped raise my awareness. What an IDIOT.)




Rage Against the Machine continued the legacy of The Clash, MC5 and Public Enemy as one of the only bands that mattered in the Clinton era (1993-2001) who didn't just rest on their laurels. They got angrier as they got older but they remained LA to their core - even naming their final original album Battle of Los Angeles.

Somehow they achieved more success than any political band in recent memory. In a time of prosperity, they stayed vigilant even on Saturday Night Live and at the 2000 Democratic National Convention. And sonically, they were just way too creative as Tom Morello made his guitar sound like anything and everything.

They got the hint. Music/message have to both be strong. But even though I like Zach and Co. and seeing them live in 2007 remains one of my highlights, I can't put them above RHCP thanks to their premature breakup. I would've loved for them to stay together during the Bush II Administration, especially in 2004. One of the 90's greatest bands and I'll always stay tuned to "Guerrilla Radio."



Jane's Addiction almost singlehandedly created the alternative rock scene. They're one of the most unique bands ever and I'm a big fan of Dave Navarro's playing - ironically I refuse to buy his only album with RHCP even though "My Friends" is a great song.

As great as their influence is and their songs are, their peak was almost shorter than Guns N Roses (3 years) and even though their song is in the intro of "Entourage," there's always a doubt that Jane's will ever stick around long enough to enjoy them. But their mark is set in stone.



Motley Crue? They ruled the 80's but let's be real. The only reason they're still relevant to most folks my age is because of Tommy Lee. I respect the Crue as legends and they're possibly the greatest hair-metal band but ask my peers to name a Crue song besides "Girls, Girls, Girls." Besides Tommy Lee's underrated drumming, they didn't musically add much to the game and their image trumped that.

No hate, just facts. In the same breath, you can argue N.W.A. was a band and deserves a role on this list. Unfortunately 3 albums means they're in the same breath as Jane's Addiction. They were the hip-hop Guns' N Roses and while their impact is untouchable, Dr. Dre and Ice Cube's solo work make you only wonder what they could've done if they weren't screwed over by money.

So there you have it. Oh wait a sec, what's this noise? My God! That could only mean one thing. I forgot about these guys!



Yep, Metallica started in LA. And they have everything the Chili Peppers have - longevity, impact, sales, hits, mainstream acceptance, relevance (thanks to their last album). Matter of fact, they and RHCP broke through (albums in 1988), changed the game (albums in 1991), went through an identity crisis in the mid-90's, came back with a force in 1999 (Californication and S&M) and still made an impact in the 2000's.

One of the greatest metal bands ever and among the greatest at their respective skills (James Hetfield - phenomenal voice, Kirk Hammett - Top 5 Guitarist of the last 30 years, Lars Ulrich - one of the greatest drummers ever and most versatile since he cowrites most of the band's lyrics).

You can't beat 5 straight No.1 albums. And even if I can't see them as an L.A. band like RHCP, they represent the best my city has to offer. So I guess the answer is a tie? Or a question for another blog.

By the way, the greatest band from LA period? These two trump everybody.